But is bigness per se really to blame for the absence of
ethics among our senior executives of businesses? Somehow, commercial entities
have grown apart from their customer base. When they seem to care, it almost
always is a charade. But why, I keep
asking? Was it always like that? Maybe I am just getting really old. I think
that businessmen used to have actual ethics and practiced it. I know that the Rupert Murdoch’s of the world—total
sociopaths—have always existed, but they represented aberrant behavior. The old
“rotten fish in the barrel” seemed more accurate. Now, it just seems a joke (on
us). The Penn State mess seems typical
of the problem. Protecting the Franchise was viewed as simply more important
than protecting the kids—the Catholic Church line of thinking.
On the other hand, maybe bigness is a major contributor.
Perhaps, the more distant executives get from their customers and from the
people whose lives they touch, the easier it is to rationalize away their
criminal behavior. When bankers joke
about manipulating interest rates in order to increase their pocket change, and
their own internal systems either fail or are simply missing in action, perhaps
those entities should be shut down. Whenever I hear some business entity
whining about some regulation, I think, “maybe you need to get a real job. Shut
up and quit whining, or you will need to go out of business.” Perhaps had the
Catholic Church forced its pedophilic priests to enter jail cells, they might
have been able to hang on to some of their moral standing. Perhaps if Joe Paterno had arranged to send
his buddy to prison ten years ago, a lot of kids would have been spared a
lifetime of grief.
And perhaps somewhere pigs are flying, hell is freezing over,
and the moon really is made of green cheese . . .
No comments:
Post a Comment