We have been watching another of our host of British
mysteries, this one, The Fall. It is all about a sadist who murders young
women. In the afterworld, where I actually think, I have been thinking about
what someone is doing when they take another person’s life, especially a young
person. What are we, after all, but a body of human experience potential?
Someone who is, say, 30, has stored within 50, 60, even 70 years of potential
experiences, many pleasant, even beautiful ones. So, taking that person’s life is robbing them
of those experiences. At one level, the act of murder is an act of the moment.
It arguably gives the perpetrator a moment of pleasure at the act. But, it is
really stealing a lifetime of experiences from the person so deprived. But the
perpetrator doesn’t even think of the act in those terms—as taking away years
of experiences in exchange for a single moment of . . . of what . . . pleasure?
And then I thought, but what about acts we commit that alter
a person’s life in some unpleasant way? We decide to define the world into
castes, in which some folks are at the top and some are at the bottom—the throw-aways
of our world. What are we doing by such an act? Well, we are forcing the folks
so defined as the bottom-dwellers to a lifetime of misery, instead of a
lifetime of happiness. See we actually
know that, but we mostly don’t think of our acts in such terms—stealing a
person’s lifetime of happy experiences so that we can live better today. That is the actual price of our chosen path.
Similarly, when we embarked on a campaign to enslave people,
we were stealing from those people their future lives, some of which would be
filled with happy experiences. We stole their lives, much as if we had just
killed them.
And then, today, when we smugly deride whole groups of
people labeling them as desirable or undesirable, because of the color of their
skin, or because they believe in a god different than our God, or because they
are of a different gender, we are changing their lives in ways we cannot even
predict, but ways likely to be less happy, and more stressful. So, again, we
are stealing from those people, something we actually do not own, but can
control—the future experiences of those other people.
But do we commit such acts of theft knowing the grotesque
effects of the acts we are committing? Not likely. Mainly, we choose not to
think, because thinking is difficult, and involves making choices we may not be
comfortable making.
Life is but a balancing act. Life requires us to think so as
to maintain a balance between good and harm. Some, perhaps many, folks prefer
not to think overly much, because thinking requires mental agility, and acting
on rote convictions is often more convincing and, just, easier.
So, acts of racism, or bigotry, or misogyny, or simple cruelty
can become our preferred lifestyle—thereby defining our own lifetime of
experiences.
Kindness could arguably also become a lifestyle. Kindness is
less certain than emotional violence (racism), but it might actually spread,
because an act of kindness could become contagious. Others might also begin to
choose kindness rather than violence, but only those who actually think about
life and the consequences of our individual acts.
Would it not be a better world, if we all tried to eliminate
hate and inserted kindness instead?
Wow, what a concept . . . kindness instead of hate. What a
wonderful world it might be . . .
No comments:
Post a Comment